MaterializeInc/materialize
GitHubThe live data layer for apps and AI agents. Create up-to-the-second views into your business, just using SQL
- Stars:
- 6.4k
- Language:
- Rust
- Default branch:
- main
- Last scored:
At a glance
- Rank
- #113 of 401
- Top 28% · #18 of 45 Rust repos
- Checks passed
- 10 of 17
- Full list below
- Best set up for
- Pi
- Score 81.3
- Needs most work for
- OpenHands
- Biggest fix: Reproducible dev env (+10.0 pts)
What it has
What it's missing
What to fix first
Showing fixes for Claude Code
- 1Reproducible dev envAdd a Makefile or devcontainer or Dockerfile so the agent can set up the project in one command.+11.8 pts
- 2Pre-commit / git hooksSet up pre-commit (.pre-commit-config.yaml), husky, or lefthook to run format+lint on every commit.+5.3 pts
- 3Manageable sizeIf possible, split into smaller modules or carve out a focused entry path. Document where to start in AGENTS.md.+5.3 pts
Score for each AI agent
Each agent weighs the checks by its own docs. Under each score are its top three. How each agent is scored →
Does MaterializeInc/materialize have agent instructions?
An AGENTS.md (or CLAUDE.md) at the root tells AI coding agents how to build, test and work in the repo. A few agents also read a file of their own.
- AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md
AGENTS.md(new tab) · 9,141 characters- Agent-specific files
.agents/skills(new tab) (19 skills)No GEMINI.md, .cursor/rules, .openhands/setup.sh or .aider.conf.yml- Repos that have one
- 24 of 45 Rust repos · 221 of 401 repos on the leaderboard · See examples →
All 17 checks · 10 passed
How MaterializeInc/materialize compares
- vs leaderboard average
- 8.8 pts above
- Average 66.8
- vs Rust average
- 5.0 pts above
- Average 70.6
- Stars among Rust repos
- #43 of 45
Missing here, and how many repos have it
- Pre-commit / git hooks · passed by 29% of leaderboard repos, 20% of Rust repos
- Reproducible dev env · passed by 22% of leaderboard repos, 33% of Rust repos
- Cursor rules (.cursor/rules) · passed by 4% of leaderboard repos, 2% of Rust repos
Passes checks most repos miss
- Skills (.agents/skills) · only 17% of repos pass it
One fix for the most agents: Reproducible dev env would raise the score for all 9 agents, by up to 11.9 points.
Similar repos
Same language and host as this repo, closest in overall score.
- astral-sh/uv78.3Rust · 91.5k ★
- biomejs/biome77.8Rust · 26k ★
- Rust · 9.4k ★
- Rust · 29.6k ★
- nushell/nushell73.7Rust · 40.8k ★
- Rust · 46.8k ★
Same topics, any language
Repos tagged with the same GitHub topics, most shared first.
- prisma/orm69.3TypeScript · database, MySQL, PostgreSQL, sql server
- TypeScript · database, MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL
- Java · cdc, database, kafka
- C++ · kafka, stream processing, streaming
- questdb/questdb61.9Java · database, SQL, stream processing
- trinodb/trino58.6Java · database, distributed systems, SQL
Add a badge to your README
Paste this at the top of the README. It shows the score, and links back to this page.
[](https://agentfriendlycode.com/repo/github/MaterializeInc/materialize)Check the score on every pull request
A GitHub Action posts one comment per pull request with how the score changed and why.