Agent Friendly Code

JuliaLang/julia

GitHub
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia

The Julia Programming Language

  • hacktoberfest
  • hpc
  • julia
  • julia-language
  • julialang
  • machine-learning
  • numerical
  • programming-language
  • science
  • scientific
Stars:
49.2k
Language:
Julia
Default branch:
master
Last scored:
Overall

At a glance

Rank
#187 of 401
Top 47%
Checks passed
9 of 17
Full list below
Best set up for
Kimi Code CLI
Score 74.7
Needs most work for
Aider
Biggest fix: .aider.conf.yml (+14.1 pts)

What it has

What it's missing

What to fix first

Pick an AI agent

Showing fixes for Claude Code

  1. 1
    Dependency manifest
    Commit a proper manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) plus a lockfile.
    +9.2 pts
  2. 2
    Type configuration
    Add a type config (tsconfig.json for JS/TS, mypy.ini or pyrightconfig.json for Python). Rust/Go/JVM/Scala/Swift/C#/OCaml/Haskell/Zig are typed by default.
    +7.9 pts
  3. 3
    Pre-commit / git hooks
    Set up pre-commit (.pre-commit-config.yaml), husky, or lefthook to run format+lint on every commit.
    +5.3 pts

Score for each AI agent

Each agent weighs the checks by its own docs. Under each score are its top three. How each agent is scored →

Kimi Code CLI
#147 of 401
74.7
  • ✓AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md
  • ✓Test suite
  • ✗Dependency manifest
Claude Code
#174 of 401
74.3
  • ✓AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md
  • ✓Test suite
  • ✓Reproducible dev env
Codex
#160 of 401
74.1
  • ✓AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md
  • ✓README
  • ✓Test suite
Pi
#145 of 401
74.0
  • ✓AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md
  • ✓Test suite
  • ✓Linter / formatter config
Devin
#188 of 401
70.2
  • ✓Reproducible dev env
  • ✗Dependency manifest
  • ✓Test suite
OpenHands
#204 of 401
65.5
  • ✓CI configuration
  • ✗Dependency manifest
  • ✓Reproducible dev env
Gemini CLI
#208 of 401
63.6
  • ✗GEMINI.md
  • ✓README
  • ✓Test suite
Cursor
#222 of 401
62.1
  • ✗Cursor rules (.cursor/rules)
  • ✓README
  • ✗Type configuration
Aider
#235 of 401
62.0
  • ✗.aider.conf.yml
  • ✓Linter / formatter config
  • ✓Test suite

Does JuliaLang/julia have agent instructions?

An AGENTS.md (or CLAUDE.md) at the root tells AI coding agents how to build, test and work in the repo. A few agents also read a file of their own.

AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md
AGENTS.md (new tab) · 6,706 characters
Agent-specific files
.agents/skills (new tab) (8 skills)No GEMINI.md, .cursor/rules, .openhands/setup.sh or .aider.conf.yml
Repos that have one
221 of 401 repos on the leaderboard · See examples →

All 17 checks · 9 passed

Skills (.agents/skills)· 100% pass
8 skills in .agents/skills/
.agents/skills/buildkite-logs/SKILL.md
AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md· 100% pass
Substantive (6,706 characters)
AGENTS.md
.aider.conf.yml· 0% pass
No .aider.conf.yml at repo root
CI configuration· 100% pass
6 GitHub Actions workflows
.github/workflows
CONTRIBUTING guide· 100% pass
Guide present
CONTRIBUTING.md
Cursor rules (.cursor/rules)· 0% pass
No .cursor/rules/*.mdc or .cursorrules
Dependency manifest· 0% pass
No dependency manifest found
Reproducible dev env· 100% pass
2 env artifacts (Makefile, .devcontainer/devcontainer.json)
Makefile
GEMINI.md· 0% pass
No GEMINI.md at repo root
License file· 100% pass
License present
LICENSE.md
Linter / formatter config· 100% pass
Config detected
.clang-format
.openhands/setup.sh· 0% pass
No .openhands/setup.sh
Pre-commit / git hooks· 0% pass
No pre-commit / husky / lefthook found
README· 100% pass
README detailed (8,300 characters)
README.md
Manageable size· 50% pass
2059 files — large
Test suite· 100% pass
Found /test
test
Type configuration· 0% pass
No type config found

How JuliaLang/julia compares

vs leaderboard average
2.1 pts above
Average 66.8

Missing here, and how many repos have it

  • Dependency manifest · passed by 92% of leaderboard repos
  • Type configuration · passed by 68% of leaderboard repos
  • Pre-commit / git hooks · passed by 29% of leaderboard repos

Passes checks most repos miss

  • Skills (.agents/skills) · only 17% of repos pass it
  • Reproducible dev env · only 22% of repos pass it

One fix for the most agents: Type configuration would raise the score for all 9 agents, by up to 11.5 points.

Similar repos

The repos closest to it in overall score.

Same topics, any language

Repos tagged with the same GitHub topics, most shared first.

Add a badge to your README

Paste this at the top of the README. It shows the score, and links back to this page.

Agent friendly score for github/JuliaLang/julia
[![Agent Friendly](https://agentfriendlycode.com/api/badge/github/JuliaLang/julia.svg)](https://agentfriendlycode.com/repo/github/JuliaLang/julia)

Check the score on every pull request

A GitHub Action posts one comment per pull request with how the score changed and why.